FPN Review: Noodler’s Majestic Orange (Singapore Series)
(Here’s a link to my first FPN review!)
Here’s a review of Noodler’s Majestic Orange (thanks to penguinmaster for the review template!):
This ink is from Noodler’s Singapore Series. It’s billed as bulletproof, though I haven’t tested its waterproofness or UV-fastness, etc.
The handwritten sample was written on HP 32# Premium Laserjet paper with a Sensa Meridian gold-plated nib, custom ground to an XF 0.3mm round point.
Drying time: pretty good for a Noodler’s bulletproof ink. As you can see, there wasn’t much smudging after 10 seconds.
Flow: good flow–doesn’t gush, but is definitely not on the stingy side. It starts up immediately even after leaving it unused in the pen for a week or more. It also performs well while writing, and doesn’t dry up in the nib while you pause.
Feathering/Bleedthrough: I tried this ink on many different papers (Rhodia, Clairefontaine, Pentalic, Alvin Saray, Apica, Derwent, hand*book, Pen+Ink, Exacompta). There was no feathering on most of these papers–the Rhodia, Apica, Pentalic had a very, very tiny bit of feathering (like a tiny stray bump every few words or so), but most people probably wouldn’t notice it. I’m a bit obsessive about feathering. There wasn’t any bleedthough that I could detect (if by bleedthrough you mean dotting the next page). There was a little bit of show-through on the reverse side of the page in thinner paper such as Apica (though less than some other Noodler’s bulletproofs like Upper Ganges Blue).
Shading: very little on any paper I tried. I only use XF Sensa Meridians, so I have no experience with other pens/nibs.
I’m not sure I’d use this ink to write a novel–it’d be a bit hard to read that much text in this color. I use it for journal entries and margin notes. It’s a nice, strong orange without being too reddish (it looks redder on my monitor than it does in real life). In fact, now that I look at my Rhodia pad, it’s not that dissimilar from the orange cover of the stapled graph paper pad. How’s that for a frame of reference!
Comments (2)

Did you intentionally misspell perspicacious in your title?
Yup!
Instead of using “perspicacious,” I was playing off of the word “percipient,” from the Latin “percipiens.” (The word “perspicacious” sounds too much like
Plus, this way, googling my blog title yields pretty much only my blog and links to my blog.
“perspiration” to me!